science

15765 readers

302 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

264

CDC orders its scientists to withdraw new papers to hunt out ‘forbidden terms': reports (www.huffpost.com)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Summary

The CDC has ordered its scientists to withdraw or pause pending research papers for review by the Trump administration, which is enforcing a ban on terms like “gender,” “LGBT,” and “pregnant person.”

An internal email revealed that all manuscripts, even those already accepted for publication, must comply.

Reuters confirmed the directive, which follows broader federal efforts to remove references to gender identity from government materials.

Critics warn the policy could hinder scientific integrity, as even demographic terms like “gender” may be censored.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

US free speech protections are very narrow in scope, only applying to the government.

This is the part I'm referring to. United States constitutional free speech. Sure the twitter thing is a debatable issue, but it's a side issue. That issue was not and is not protected by the constitution. You can argue that it should be all you want, but it currently isn't and therefore wasn't illegal.

The thing with the CDC is an actual violation of the constitution and a real life example of the government violating the rights it is supposed to be upholding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

You mentioned the word outcry in your first post. I therefore assume we are not discussing legality but the response of the US public. Which is not as much as you believe it should be.

The explanation is that the American public does not actually care for free speech as a human right that much. Your own dismissal of corporate censorship as not 'actual' censorship reinforces my point. It being illegal on it's own won't necessarily cause an outcry.

Especially when it's done to people that the American public has been propagandized to hate for decades. Ivory tower scientists, 'working' for the government like a commie instead of working for a corporation, like Tesla.