this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
33 points (85.1% liked)

Europe

2216 readers
1088 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Apologies for the previous fuckup. This time the link should be correct.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Thanks! Seems I'd need a degree in economics to really understand this. My field is more computer science. And you oftend tend to get definite answers with that, not 10 studies with wildly different numbers, disagreeing on everything... ๐Ÿ˜’

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The idea of the Gini coefficient itself is relatively simple. What I suspect is happening here is that different studies are using or weighting wealth numbers differently, most likely in regards to asset ownership (mostly housing) and thus come to different conclusions.

This is more obvious in the Europe comparison article where all the EU countries that have high rental housing rates or other severe restrictions on home ownership like Sweden are rated especially poorly.

In the US in comparison the home ownership rate is relatively high, but the quality of the housing stock is low (despite still inflated prices for them). So as others have said it is a bit of an apples and oranges comparison sadly.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Hmmh. I mean it's complicated. Especially housing seems to work quite differently. And we often buy the whole kitchen and furniture ourselves even while renting. Plus the entire house is made of different material, like bricks and mortar. I'm not sure how that translates into cost and value of the house. But yeah, I'm not sure what my question is. These numbers all have their merit and use cases but there's a lot of things involved. Maybe I just like to live a comfortable life rather than work my butt off for 80h a week to own a lot of assets to rent out. I'm not sure. I think my main thing is it needs to be sustainable. We can't have a small minority "owning" the country. There needs to be a middle class, and the poor people need to be able to sustain a living without working several jobs without a perspective in life. That'd be great. I'm not super concerned with the numbers themselves, but more with the resulting effect they have on society and life. And I suppose that's hard to quantify.
I often get the feeling that it's far more accepted in the USA that rich people get to decide. And large companies are allowed to rip off the citizens, be it privacy, labor law, healthcare. And the atmosphere in Europe is a bit different and we do way more regulation to try to even out things in a more socialist(?) way. But that doesn't mean it neccesarily turns out that way.