this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
45 points (97.9% liked)

3DPrinting

16320 readers
147 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a piece of test equipment that needs to stay underwater for days. Normally I would use or make a waterproof case with a lid and a gasket.

Instead, I'm wondering if I could print a box, pause the print just before the top face, put the device inside and then print the top face over it. No openings, no nothing, and the device works by induction so it doesn't need to physically connect to anything.

But this would only work if 3D-printed PLA walls are really waterproof. After all, 3D-printed features are kind of a bunch of wires more or less loosely attached to each other, so I wouldn't be surprised if water could leak through under pressure.

Before I spend any time assessing this myself, has anybody tried printing waterproof enclosures?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How big of equipment? A ziplock freezer bag might do the trick for you, or if you're fancy, vacuum seal it. I trust that to sous vide meat for days, at elevated temps even.

What is the sensor sensing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It records temperature and EM radiation. We have a customer that has EMC requirements for underwater equipment 🙂 I mean as long as they pay eh...

The device is maybe 4" x 3" x 3" - possibly longer on the long side - and fairly expensive. The ziplock bag thing may work but it looks sketchy considering the price of the thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

A vacuum sealer would be more robust and look less janky than a Ziploc bag. You can get a used food saver for cheap!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Just spit balling here. Maybe put your sensor in a ziplock or vacuum seal it and then put that inside your 3D printed box that way you get all the security without the jank look.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How deep? Pressure might be a problem? (I'm curious if this is a documented spec, and which one it is. I'm very curious)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Not very deep. About 3 ft.