this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
47 points (91.2% liked)
And Finally...
1278 readers
161 users here now
A place for odd or quirky world news stories.
Elsewhere in the Fediverse:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other
- The Internet will resurface old "And finally..." material. Just mark it [VINTAGE]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Money and motive. I actually live in one of the few cities that do this.
It is not a perfect solution. And as dumb as this sounds. That is often used as a reason not to spend on such plants. The issue is you simply cannot capture all co2 from burning. And still have to do something with what you do capture. Of course this in no way makes land fill better. But there is a reason for the phrase "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. ". Building waste energy plants is more expensive (much) then continuing to fill a land fill. And people do genuinely use such arguments to refuse the spending.
Add to that local authority government is normally so low turn out. That a few a noted voters can prevent things happening. And you have your answer.