this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
42 points (97.7% liked)

Selfhosted

42092 readers
519 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title question mostly. I've played with XTTS-v2 and it worked pretty well, but I'm wondering if folks are using anything else special. I'd like to train my own voice finetune which is what I did with XTTS-v2, and then use it with home assistant's voice feature. Welcome all opinions on it!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty much just personal preference at this point. XTTS is certainly not the most efficient though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

any personal preferences you recommend?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Pico, Piper, Mary, and Google all run locally and off of CPU only.

I think all the rest require cloud accounts or acceleration hardware to work quickly.

I'm personally fine with Mary or Piper, but I know some people like the fancier ones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Google? Have you verified that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The docs don't say it's completely offline. Can you turn off your LAN connection and it still works? Have you tried this? Or just firewall off out bound access to Google services?

This comment:

Contrary to what the name suggests, the integration only does text-to-speech and does not translate messages sent to it.

doesn't say it doesn't call out to Google services; it says only that it doesn't use translation services. I didn't see anything else that implies it doesn't send data to Google.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If it doesn't require an API key in the config, it's offline. My HA works totally offline unless I need to do updates, and it's always worked for me.

You can also view the code, cuz open source.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, so I dug into it, and it's definitely not offline. It uses gtts, which ultimately makes calls to google.com for the tts. You can track it down yourself, but you'll eventually end up here, which talks about how to change the google host name in case it's blocked.

I'm not sure why you believe not needing an API key means it isn't calling a Google API, especially in this case where it clearly states it's using an unofficial channel - which is the same trick third party YouTube clients use to access YouTube videos without using API keys.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

👍 Thanks. I'm surprised, and still skeptical, but thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I was curious and it uses gTTS.

It calls what's probably the "speak" button on translate.google.com

This project is leveraging the undocumented Google Translate speech functionality