this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1048 readers
168 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is not an actual drop in performance. Zen 5 and Arrow Lake are clearly better than earlier generations; but it is interesting that their scores are stagnant in recent years.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So if I'm reading this right, this is the average performance aggregate of all systems tested year over year.

Meaning, the systems tested this year, as a whole, came out to a lower average score. The top end systems were probably still more powerful, but there could be less top end systems this year, and overall scores were pulled down by the mid or lower ends.

I'd assume this means less people bought the highest end equipment this year compared to prior years. Pricing has gotten extreme for the highest end and I'm betting less people see the value in it with modern gaming being in the state it's in.

But I'd also be curious what the median is, and how many systems were scored annually.