MTG

2009 readers

1 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Introducing Commander Brackets Beta (magic.wizards.com)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think this system has the potential to achieve its objective, if it doesn't end up causing more confusion. Five brackets might be kind of a lot, although I hear what Gavin's saying about why they went up from three, and 40 "game-changers" is definitely a lot. Nobody will or should try to memorize what's a game-changer, especially if the list can fluctuate the same as a ban list. It might be better to try to use categories that explain why the game-changing cards are a problem... except that Gavin did exactly that in the article, and it's still a fairly long list.

All of my Commander decks would be in bracket 1 or 2 and my main question is how to decide which. Most don't have sub-optimal card choices to fit a theme, but all have sub-optimal card choices for budget reasons, and I'm not sure whether any of them are really a fair match for a precon. Should I say "bracket 1.5"?