this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

PieFed Promo

38 readers
3 users here now

We will meme our way to victory

founded 1 week ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (10 children)

I have blocked all users from lemmy.ml

Sweet hallelujah! Actually working filtering! Holy shit, say no more :DD

Mind you, a lot of the more basic UI/UX features of PieFed are still lacking, like a post preview, but there's more and more added each week, and it's written in Python so easier for people to contribute to.

I don't like the UI and that's a problem for me. But I talked to rimu in the matrix room, he said the API is very, very close to finishing and is going to be similar to the lemmy api; this should make porting clients and apps very trivial.

the "search" feature is particularly bad right now

Tell me about it, i can't properly search for communities lol. Maybe there's something i'm missing x)

You would be very welcomed here:-).

Thanks <3 I've been waiting for the API to come so some app devs can port, then i'll switch. Piefed to me is objectively superior in everything but that. I'll miss dbzer0 though :'(

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (9 children)

There is a port of Thunder that reportedly works already, but yeah things will improve there when the API is ready.

There still are a ton of features that the basic web UI offers that an app likely would not - like Categories of Communities (well, some apps have those already though I guess). But, yeah an app would simplify other things as well.

dbzer0 is amazing, the admin is amazing and that makes the instance wonderful to be on, I would presume.:-) He has also contributed to the Lemmy sourcecode, and possibly to the PieFed one as well although I'm not as certain about that.

The search is indeed primitive, but I think searching for communities specifically works just fine, it's just that it's an entirely different page in that particular case: just to see it, try searching from https://piefed.social/communities.

Searching for users is even worse: https://piefed.social/instance/piefed.social/people, basically there's no "search" functionality at all, just a listing that you keep having to hit Next Page on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (8 children)

There is a port of Thunder that reportedly works already, but yeah things will improve there when the API is ready.

I actually tried it out; it only works on pythag.net (a private test instance, by andrew) but it's really cool.

There still are a ton of features that the basic web UI offers that an app likely would not - like Categories of Communities (well, some apps have those already though I guess). But, yeah an app would simplify other things as well.

I thought of this too, but hopefully while porting they'd also implement those features with it

dbzer0 is amazing, the admin is amazing and that makes the instance wonderful to be on, I would presume.:-) He has also contributed to the Lemmy sourcecode, and possibly to the PieFed one as well although I'm not as certain about that.

Absolutely. I think if piefed is mature enough he may run a piefed instance? I hope so!

The search needs work but i'll manage, anything to get away from lemmy (after UI ofc x))

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I didn't expect to see myself there. lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

🌏👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Oh, that's your alt? Cool

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think you may have replied to the wrong comment? Sorry if it is myself that is wrong here:-).

You are a person too - and you matter! 💕

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm the person in the screenshot included. haha

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Oh. I wondered but you considered it unlikely. Carry on then!:-P

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)