this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
129 points (86.4% liked)

Technology

62161 readers
4207 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

It even says in the article 40 watts. I’m not going to say this affects literally nothing, but it is not a significant enough amount of power to meaningfully affect the locomotion of a car. It might make more sense in much more scaled up helicopters and planes where fuel economy is a far bigger problem. But thermoelectric has never been a very potent method.

Also, you’ve got some nerve calling someone a fool for not assuming we will retrofit every motor on earth with this technology. There are a lot of things that would be nice to retrofit the entire installed base of the world with. But that is an enormous barrier that only…. fools ignore.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Fools logic was meaning this type of technology doesn't have a purpose when it definitely does and that is how your post came off lack of context I guess, it is the internet.

While it won't power the locomotion of the car it will help to power accessories even on a 40w basis even more so over trips and somewhat lengthy drives.

Your post lacked any of your clarifications so it comes off as you simply think this is an ignorant waste of time concept as a whole. Energy recovery is a useful premise.

But making micro machines to do it, or retrofitting old cars with this wouldnt help much but manufacturing newer more effecient vehicles isn't a viable strategy like the guy explains above you. There's other uses besides moving a vehicle, hydro would be one of the biggest. There's other fields and applications this could be used for having nothing to do with configuration. All I was saying was that this tech has viability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You are confusing me with other person. Read the names.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

Oh damn 😂 my bad.