this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
1594 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

62853 readers
5097 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The president of Mexico on Thursday expressed hope that Google "reconsiders" its decision to change its online maps to reflect U.S. President Donald Trump's claim that he has the authority to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

Shortly after taking office, Trump issued an executive order announcing he was changing the name of the body of water to the Gulf of America.

For U.S. users of Google Maps, the gulf was listed as the Gulf of America as of Thursday. Google, whose CEO attended Trump's inauguration along with other tech moguls, said last month it has "a long-standing practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources."

But Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum warned Thursday that her government "will file a civil suit" against Google if it does not revert back to labeling the international body of water the Gulf of Mexico.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Nah. I'll start boycotting google when there are useful alternatives. Amazon, facebook, reddit - no problem.

Google search - fine, I can get by with DDG or Yandex. Gmail - sure, whatever. Maps? Organic Maps (and other openstreetmaps front-ends) works alright for getting your bearings, but it's a far cry from useful for finding businesses, and terrible for navigation. Waze used to be the only viable alternative, but ever since Google bought them, it's hard to justify a full boycott without massively inconveniencing myself.

Same for meta as a whole. Facebook and Instagram, sure, no need. But living without whatsapp is simply impossible in some countries, where it's the de-facto standard for communication, and even used as the only means of contact with government agencies.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If you disapprove of internet companies caving to authoritarian politics, I have bad news for you about Yandex

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We did it with Lemmy. It CAN be done!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To an extent. Lemmy is a useful substitute for reddit because it's anonymous, so I don't know and to an extent don't care who I'm talking to. With messenger services it's a different use case, I need the exact people I want to talk to on there, or it's essentially worthless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Its not completely anonymous when the server admins have your IP.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

True, I meant anonymous in the sense that participants are not generally identifiable by one another.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah its true unfortunately

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fr, I try, but it’s really not possible to get away from these companies.

Nobody wants signal, nobody wants mastodon, nobody wants or frankly can use openstreetmaps. Alternatives are just not good enough

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Alternatives are just not good enough

And to no fault of their own of course. They just aren't working with the same resources as Google and the others.

I think it's more a question of stepping down our level of comfort at this point. Can we live without a particular service that Google provides, when there are no alternatives with feature parity? Or can we live with the fact that some of the features aren't working as well or missing, and use the alternatives anyway?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Exactly. If there were perfectly interchangeable alternatives, there would have been a true competition and those companies wouldn't be holding the amount of power they do today in the first place.

Moving to alternatives requires some degree of effort and giving up on some microconforts. There's no other way. There's no fight without any pain. If we want to fight those companies, we must sacrifice those micro conforts, even if that means reducing tech use as a whole and doing a few things the "old fashioned" way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Yeah, I still find it impressive how good mastodon and lemmy are given the limitations.

For sure, and that is possible for personal things, but for social things it’s almost impossible to live without some features.

People don’t want to step down their level of comfort when it comes to WhatsApp (where I live people don’t use SMS because they’re limited), so you’re forced to either keep your contacts (which includes family) or move to signal/threema/session/matrix/etc. But have no one to talk to