this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

0 readers
69 users here now

All things photography. Share your own original photos, your questions, your inspiration.

Rules

Share your own original photography. No NSFW images. Be Nice.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Waldorf-Astoria Hotel (with Neighbors), NYC, 2017.

All the pixels, excluding taxes, resort fees, and tips, at https://www.flickr.com/photos/mattblaze/32609074081/

#photography

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@[email protected]

Feel free to tell me I'm dizzy, but:

I find correctly perspective corrected images to make the buildings look top-heavy. You've got the lines straight and parallel, but what I'd want would be a perceptually realistic (yes, that doesn't mean anything: sue me) rendering. And I don't know how to do that.

I let my Canon 24 TSE II go because with the adaptor it was just too much of a clunker on a mirrorless. Sigh. So I haven't put in anywhere near the amount of effort this deserves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

@djl I think a lot of what looks "correct" has to do with learned expectations. If you look at photos of architecture from, say, 100 years ago, the majority display carefully aligned vertical lines, because most cameras had movements that made that easy. As small cameras (without movements) became more common even in professional use, that expectation declined.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

@djl Also, if you look at *paintings* from the same period, you often see the opposite, with highly exaggerated perspective effects that photography of the time generally avoided. (See, for example O'Keeffe's skyscraper paintings).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@[email protected]

Matt: Looking at more images is, of course, good advice. You've mentioned in the past several names I wasn't aware of, so, thanks.

I got stuck on the Minor White/Ansel Adams axis in high school (68-72 or so) when every issue of Aperture was jaw-dropping amazing. I really wanted to study with Minor White (who was at MIT when I was), but realized a hyperactive computer nerd might grate on White's sensibilities...

An attempt from those days...

https://pbase.com/davidjl/image/170630571

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago