Linux

50329 readers

1512 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

"SO proof" distro (self.linux)

submitted 6 days ago by Hozerkiller to c/[email protected]

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Any recommendations for a linux distro that i can set up and be reasonably sure my non techy SO won't break accidentally? The set up doesn't have to be easy it just has to not break once I leave her alone with it. My first thought was popOS.

My plan is to have 2 profiles and not give her access to sudo. I just don't want to have to go into it unless she needs a new program.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Fedora is a bit too eager to deliver new updates IMO, especially KDE. As much as I love KDE, their .0 releases have had serious bugs several times in a row now. It's always better to wait for .1 patch with Plasma. It may be hard for the user to break Kinoite, but it won't save them from bugs.

Fedora's mission have always been to push new stuff when it's "mostly ready" at the cost of inconveniencing of some users, so I wouldn't recommend it for non-tech-savvy people.

I know people say that it's 100% stable for them (as they do for Arch, Tumbleweed, Debian Sid, etc) but that's survirorship bias. As any bleeding edge distro, Fedora has its periods of stability that are broken by tumultuous transitions to the new and shiny tech (like it was with Pipewire, Wayland default, major DE upgrades, etc). During these times some people's setup will break and you don't know ahead of time if it will be yours.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Pick one of the stable channels from Universal Blue. You get the Fedora atomic goodness, but "ready" rather than "mostly ready".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Does it use the same flawed approach as Manjaro by indiscriminately delaying all updates (including critical security fixes)?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It would be whatever Fedora is doing in stable, but that seems unlikely. I'm sure the internet has the answer.

I've been on the latest branch for a year and it's been rock solid across 2 different laptops.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I don't think Fedora has a "stable" channel. It has "testing" repo from which updates are pushed to "updates" repo after approval, and that's it. My understanding is that ublue's "latest" channel follows Fedora's "updates", while "stable" seems to update weekly (though it's unclear what happens if a package update arrives in Fedora just before "stable" image is about to be built)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

eh, gnome is about the same.

i always wait for at least the .1 or .2

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Haven't used GNOME for a while, but I guess that's a problem of open source projects in general. Though GNOME at least has Red Hat behind it.