this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
78 points (97.6% liked)
Transgender
327 readers
284 users here now
Overview:
The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.
Rules:
-
Keep discussions civil.
-
Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.
-
No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.
Related:
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This article comes across as having anti-trans bias.
Even if not the intent, this can come across as saying that neither hormones nor genital surgeries should be allowed.
You can't make a statement like this and not refute it. Not refuting it implies that the statement has legitimacy. Trans people do not choose to be trans; they choose to transition (which for many is really a choice between transition or suicide). People who are not trans constantly conflate this fact and see being 'trans' and 'transitioning' as the same thing. They are not the same thing.
This is the only trans-supportive part of the article. The article is about intersex people, but the rest of the article seems to highlight and fight for intersex people while undermining trans people, even though intersex and trans people are so often intertwined.
Again, this can be read as implying that it's okay for the law to restrict trans people's bodies as long as it doesn't restrict intersex people's bodies. This sentence should have been followed up with stating that neither is okay and the law doesn't respect medical science, best medical practices, or current medical guidelines.
Checkout the author's other articles:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/contributors/ari-berkowitz-phd
I suspect the author is a clueless cis person who is attempting to write educational pro-trans articles, but are trying to make their writing "balanced" so as to not be alienating to potentially anti-trans audiences.
Not writing in the most pro-trans way is not necessarily synonymous with having an anti-trans bias, but it's hard for us to not see it that way since it basically entertains anti-trans perspectives as plausible or reasonable opinions to have, etc. even while trying to gently dismantle those perspectives.
liberalism
It's tough to write most anything online because the audience could be anyone and the writer should take that into account. I suspect that this person was writing for a good-faith, academic audience.
yeah, agreed - it's tough
though you should know Psychology Today is a consumer magazine, their audience is definitely not academic but rather lay people, a bit like Scientific American