this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)
Spaceflight
811 readers
62 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Related meme community:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If the Astroscale grabs a piece of debris and nudges it toward atmosphere, won't it de-orbit itself as well? It wasn't clear from the article.
Seems like it would be more efficient to attach a couple of small boosters to the debris and wave bye-bye, Wile E. Coyote style.
Boosters would have to be carried, which is bringing extra weight into space. It also means Astroscale would need to be periodically resupplied with more disposable boosters, or just become a piece of space junk itself.
Nudging is way more efficient. You could calculate the trajectory needed to nudge a piece of space debris into an unstable orbit while keeping your own orbit stable. Or, a simpler method, just keep some extra fuel on the Astroscale to make minor adjustments to orbit as needed after capture.