this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10258 readers
270 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sanders has literally had a consistent message of beliefs since the 1960s. I don't agree with every tactic he chooses, but I understand why he backed Biden over Trump once he was locked out of the general.
If you can show me some progress you or anyone else has made on getting those things (e.g. universal healthcare) through alternative means, I'd be very interested to see it. Republicans are at this point straight evil. The Democratic Party at a leadership level is a bunch of entrenched wealthy neolibs who would rather see Republicans win than lose ground to actual progressives like Sanders, AOC, etc.
People believing that that makes the 2 parties the same thing, are either so bought into their own defeatist nihilism that they can't recognize anything but instant and total victory as progress, or they're intentionally trying to torpedo change via democratic means (maybe to validate their beliefs that they know the "proper fix" without actually having to actually have those preferred systems tested).
Sanders is inside the party, using his platform and the broad dissatisfaction post-election to push the party leadership. He's literally striking while the iron's hot. If you see that as a negative thing, or if that makes you doubt him, I don't know what to tell you.
The nationwide free breakfast program for students was created directly in response to the black panthers free breakfast program. Prefiguring a better society through direct action and political education has proven more effective than engaging in electoral politics.
SBP (which is only one relatively small and highly means-tested example) was passed by elected politicians. BPP didn't put it in place themselves, elected politicians in office who were in favor of it used the opportunity of national attention to push other elected politicians to pass it. And that is just one of many student food assistance programs, most of which were not passed due to attention created by direct action.
I'm not arguing against direct action, I'm just disputing that it's been "more effective" than other means. It tends to facilitate the more effective means. The advantages that community action provides are around being highly agile and highly targeted. It can't provide countrywide, uninterrupted assistance programs, because no community groups have the resources necessary for that. The BPP could never have provided free lunches for students nationwide by themselves, and they didn't want or attempt to.