Gaming

3792 readers

704 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.

2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.

I should not need to explain this one.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.

Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

442

Small, incremental improvements don't make shockwaves like the old massive tech leaps used to. (lemmy.world)

submitted 12 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Honestly the biggest thing missing in general lighting is usually rough specular reflections and small scale global illumination, which are very hard to do consistently without raytracing (or huge light bakes)

Activision has a good technique for baking static light maps with rough specular reflections. It's fairly efficient, however it's still a lot of data. Their recent games have been in the 100-200 gb range apparently. I'm sure light bakes make up a good portion of that. It's also not dynamic of course.

So, what I'm saying is, raytracing will help with this, hardware will advance, and everyone will get more realistic looking games hopefully.