this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
128 points (96.4% liked)

Europe

2871 readers
2319 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Following the scandal between US President Trump and Ukraine, Kiev is receiving a lot of solidarity. A different tone is coming from Hungary.

Shortly before a special EU summit, Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has announced a blockade of possible new support efforts for Ukraine. In a letter to EU Council President António Costa, which was obtained by Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Orbán wrote that he could not agree to a joint declaration by the EU heads of state and government on Thursday.

Zoltan Kovacs, the state secretary responsible for international government communications in Hungary, confirmed that the letter is authentic.

The threat from Budapest comes after US President Donald Trump threatened to abandon Ukraine in the fight against Russia if an agreement with Russia was not reached. He made serious accusations against Ukrainian head of state Volodymyr Zelensky in front of the cameras at the White House.

##Orbán calls for direct talks with Russia

Orbán went on to write that there are "strategic differences in our approach to Ukraine that cannot be bridged by drafts or communication". The EU should follow the example of the USA and hold direct talks with Russia on a ceasefire and an agreement in Ukraine.

It is therefore unlikely that the EU will be able to adopt new measures to support Ukraine at the special summit on Thursday. According to the EU's External Action Service, there should ideally be an agreement in principle on a new EU package with military aid for Ukraine.

##Unanimity is needed for far-reaching decisions

However, far-reaching decisions must be made unanimously in the EU and Hungary had already announced last week that it intended to block the plans.

The initiative of EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas is aimed at strengthening Kiev's position in the negotiations instead of pushing for peace, Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto announced via the social network X. Hungary would not support spending European taxpayers' money to prolong the war.

(Translated using DeepL)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why don't we kick Hungary out of the EU? We don't need a traitor state. And as we've seen with Brexit it is possible for a country to leave the EU.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There is no mechanism to kick members from the EU. There's article 7 which pretty much starts with first giving a warning and then everyone (except Hungary) unanimously has to agree to revoke the rights of Hungary. I'm of course simplifying the process because it doesn't matter as the EU is so toothless that they haven't even been able to give Hungary a warning.

Hungary should've gotten a warning the moment they were established as "Partly free democracy".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You guys 'member the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth? I 'member. This kind of thing is what brought them down, too.

But, there's still time to fix our Western organisations, I think. Really, 3/4 vote should be enough for anything.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know. And I think it's a lapse in better judgement from the beginning days of the EU. Nobody expected that this could be necessary one day. But alas here we are.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

They really should have seen it coming, considering basically any part of history, but that goes for most Western foreign policy decisions of the last couple decades.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago) (1 children)

They saw it coming, but Europe was made step by step, because it wouldn't have been otherwise. That's called politics. Unanimity was absolutely necessary for Europe to birth.

But now Europe needs to grow up. And it will, as it did many times already.

Edit: I missed a key point for clarity. Nobody would have joined Europe if they thought Europe could force any decision on them. Which is why it is based on unanimity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

When it comes to anything from the pre-1992 period, absolutely. They either didn't know how permanent their treaties were, or didn't know they'd be expanded to so many parties.

The EU itself was born in the "end of history" era, so I'd take a less generous reading of the politics involved. But, either way, I do hold hope.

Note that I mentioned foreign policy more broadly - there's other examples of bad decisions we're seeing the obvious impacts from now. For example, China is really rich, but still totally autocratic and threatening to neighbors. Clinton was quoted as saying them resisting democracy if they had free markets would be like "nailing jello to a wall", despite counterexamples starting somewhere in the neighborhood of 3000BC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 30 minutes ago

I realize I missed my key point : nobody would have joined Europe if they thought Europe could force anything on them. That was the key to make Europe a thing.

You're right otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The issue is that there is no real legal mechanism to kick someone out. Some might also fear that the EU is weakened politically if members can get kicked out again, if their politics upset the majority of EU members.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

They could be suspended but it would need to be unanimous. Unfortunately as soon as Poland rejoined the civilized Europe, Slovakia decided they wanted to be Russia's best vassal in Europe.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Definitely a concern. What sort of action might warrant expulsion if a means did exist? What proportion of votes would ratify the expulsion?