this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
88 points (97.8% liked)

Public Health

551 readers
25 users here now

For issues concerning:

๐Ÿฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.

Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])

Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
otter
88
Why Cancer Warning Labels for Alcohol Are Long Overdue (www.psychologytoday.com)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Alcohol is the third leading preventable cause of cancer in the United States, following tobacco and obesity. While 90 percent of Americans know tobacco causes cancer, fewer than half realize alcohol does as well. Like tobacco warnings, alcohol warning labels would help consumers make more informed health choices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have fun: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12954-021-00487-3

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You have conflated health labels on alcohol - the point of this thread - with graphic images on cigarette packages. An afterthought in the post I replied to.

I will not be wasting a second reading that.

Edit - also, please note, in your second reply in this mini-thread you claim you never questioned the effectiveness of health warnings, when this is exactly what you did in the post I replied to. You are a timewaster. Post evidence of your original assertion and I will read it.