this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
618 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

65879 readers
4711 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 88 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Weird that these protections exist for corporations that aren't actually people but no protections exist for the person who was fired.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly my thought. A corporation destroys people's lives by firing them? Nothing. Someone actually pushes back? Suddenly the government gets involved.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Eg pictures of dozens of police protecting tesla dealerships

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

yeah it's pretty crazy. almost like government is for some things and not others, and knows it, like maybe laws were always just an excuse and tool for victim blaming. or something.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The amazing thing is that the government doesn't get nearly as much tax income as you'd expect from these hugs companies. It's almost as if the politicians have some other, secret motivating factor. Oh well, I guess we'll never know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

wait, are you saying that there's this class that are the beneficiaries of governments and laws, and it's the same as the class that doesn't suffer any limitations when they do stuff that the governments and laws don't like?

and that we're in this other class, that the laws and stuff exist to punish, but has to fund them and pay for them, or we get punished for that too?

that's fucking crazy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

And how our legal system is setup to best defend the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

They are the protagonists of democracy after all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I don't see how pretending that's weird is gonna help anyone.

We all know we don't live in a just world.

We need to try and make it one, instead of pretending we're living in one which happens to have horrid injustice happening all the time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm no English major, but I'm pretty sure @[email protected] calling it weird is a rhetorical device known as sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Hmm, I wonder if it is actually. I think it's just a euphemism for it's wrong how" or "it's weird how we as people keep allowing this to happen in a democratic world", but I honestly don't think it's sarcasm.

I get the point and I write that way all the time too, but I thought to see what happens if I just stop participating in the pretense of it being weird.

But yes maybe it is just sarcasm, but like the same sort of rhetoric is often used to talk about problems which are sort of too complex and large to easily assert something which should or even could be done.

But yes. Sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)