this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
283 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

66813 readers
4624 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Company's PR dept saying "we didn't do it" is not proof of anything.

If they're not blocking 3rd party cartridges, why even implement DRM?
Do they have so much extra money that they're developing features they're not planning to use just because they're bored?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So when someone uses random sludge instead of ink and breaks the printer they can point at that as the cause.

It's basic CYA. They'll let you do whatever you want, but if something goes wrong and it breaks then you're on your own.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a very charitable way of looking at DRM.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In this case, I kind of don't blame them in terms of warranty work. Like yeah, if the machine faults out within the warranty period, they should replace it. But if the machine breaks because someone uses $3 ink from a bodega that's made from busted open bic pens, then no manufacturer should be on the hook for replacement when caused by user negligence, and I don't blame a company for using some measure to determine that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

$3 ink from a bodega

That's actually a fair price for 3rd party replacement.
I used to work at a computer shop, and people only ever bought the cheapest available cartridges.
We also used to do printer repair, do you know how many printers had to come in because of shitty ink?
The answer is zero.

And anyway, in your example the printer manufacturer has no business tracking your ink usage, whether it's by spying on you and phoning home, or recording this info in the printer's memory.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My main concern here is that they (allegedly, I haven't confirmed) remove old firmware. If customers want to try out older firmware to see if that fixes their problem, they should be able to. It doesn't cost much, so why not?

Yeah, voiding a warranty because the customer used something that could cause irreversible damage makes sense. Removing access to older firmware does not.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, that's fair on the old firmware bit, I hadn't heard about that. I have a Brother laser printer, but it's locked down on my network for phoning home.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What's the domain you blocked?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I didn't block a domain, I restricted the printer's MAC from WAN access in my router's firewall. I can still access it from any device on my network, but it just can't phone home or search for firmware updates.