this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
82 points (91.8% liked)

PC Gaming

10682 readers
554 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nintendo had registered the patents in a filing not long after Palworld's release, setting the stage for the lawsuit.

How is that even legal? Decades after releasing something, a competitor comes along and releases their product, so you decide "now's the time to file a patent" and you can kill the competitor. That should create a very unstable business environment as no new business can be safe when making a patent check as they can be filed after you created a product by somebody else. It makes no sense.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was just thinking this. Japan's patent system is so fucked up. You can do everything right, look up all relevant existing patents to make sure you're in the clear, then a competitor ex post facto files and kills your business.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doubt that any company would get away with this. Maybe only biggest hundred or so

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is literally what Nintendo is doing right now.

They filled this suit, and only THEN filed for a bunch of extra patents they didn't already have in order to increase the damages they could claim from Pocket Pair for being in violation.

I already think patents for game design mechanics are idiotic an unethical, but this is absolutely insane.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I said "get away with" and you said "they are doing" these can both be true, and I even provided the reason, too big to fail.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not only are they getting away with it, it looks like they'll continue to benefit from it.

I'm not sure what reality you're living to think they're not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Future tense is used for denoting events that have not happened yet. And also, why do you care so much? The world is fucked sixty five ways till Sunday, so why the focus here?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

What do you think will happen to them, because they pulled this?

so why the focus here?

I can pay attention to more than one thing. These greedy corporations abusing legal systems is why the world is so fucked. Trying to handwaved this as not mattering sounds like you admit you're wrong

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Japans laws regarding copyright and patents are.... hazy