this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
59 points (98.4% liked)

Ukraine

8579 readers
556 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³πŸ’₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

πŸ’³βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

πŸͺ– 🫑 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
59
US still refuses to transfer ATACMS to Ukraine (www.pravda.com.ua)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The administration of US President Joe Biden refuses to transfer long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, despite requests from Kyiv and pressure from US lawmakers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That sounds like it might be true, but is it? I've heard many things in relation to this weapon, but not anything about the inability to produce them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Shrug? This is what the budgets have indicated. The military isn't interested in pursuing this weapon anymore. They're actively trying to replace it but also don't want to give up the capability until it is fully replaced.