this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

18546 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
16
How do you see the integration of link-aggregation and microblogging? (lemmy.cloudhub.social)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Thinking about the future where Microblogging and link-aggregation sites on the fediverse have grown, how do you see them integrating?

It's a bit one-directional right now since I don't think Lemmy has the concept of following people or #topics outside of Lemmy, but mastodon users can follow Lemmy communities and the posts and comments show up fairly nicely.

Do you think the ability to combine those two domains in one interface (even the same timeline) is useful at all?

I'm envisioning a content creator posting a video on peertube and being posted to one of the link-aggregator instances and people commenting on it via Mastodon and all of the comments being able to reference each other no matter where they were posted. I think that's pretty amazing compared to what we have now where you're conversation is basically stuck where it was started on the traditional services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Awe :/ yeah that’s not nearly as integrated as I first thought it would be :(

I wonder if it would be possible to build like, a bridge that converts different types of actions to other actions that make sense on another platform?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@jax I think what all #ActivityPub connected things need is a standard for intercommunication. Things that don't necessarily get passed, but can be pulled, cached, and updated. Basic things such as timestamp in UTC, service used, post/reply hierarchy, full comment threads, title vs body, and surely a few more. Each service could add their own flairy bits on top of that to give their software its unique flavor. The likes/dislikes or up/down votes replicating to everyone is something I've heard is a deliberate(?) ""feature"". Personally, I don't think those need to be any more than an acknowledgement between two people, not a public advertisement of comment popularity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, I thought the ActivityPub standard was a lot more standard than it actually seems to be. That's probably both a good and bad thing. It would be nice to see some more cohesion though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@jax @eshep It has been a problem for a long time, yes.

But there are people working on standardizing everything. It’s a fairly recent project, not very big in scope and not very mature. But it’s getting there.

It’s called FEP (Fediverse Enhancement Proposals) and it’s like RFC for the fediverse.

You can find the standards here:
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/

And the discussion there:
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/c/standards/fep/54

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@jax @eshep

Socialhub is also running on discourse which is ALSO implementing an ActivityPub plugins, which will be compatible with lemmy! And how do we know that this will be compatible with lemmy? Because they’re following the FEP-1b12!

You can find them here @feps (the plugin is read-only at the moment)