this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
1741 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

7591 readers
3762 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Paste of part of my answer from another reply:

Imagine if Alice is a murderer, and she asks Bob if she should kill two people or five people. Bob says “five”. Now, I will of course be angry at Bob for choosing the obviously worse alternative, but I will in no way claim that he is the cause of the problem. I will not go out and rally support for “Only two people”, I will rally support for “Let’s get rid of Alice”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Same scenario

You CAN'T stop Alice. You just can't. You don't have the man power or the legal means.

So your choices are, 2 people or 5 people. If you choose to do nothing, 5 people die, if you swallow the moral superiority, only 2 people die.

Which are you choosing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

You formulated a question where your answer means you don't have ANY culpability even though you can clearly see the murders coming and mitigate it's damage.

Yes, outside of this decision, campaign to have Alice executed or jailed or whatever, but that won't stop Alice from killing 5 people, she's just GOING TO WIN if you don't stop her. You CAN reduce the number of deaths and continue to fight, hopefully with 3 more people to stand up to that kind of tyranny.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In this scenario, I'm not the one choosing, Bob is. And when Bob says "five", i will be angry, but it will be nothing in comparison with my Anger towards Alice who now can kill five people instead of the two she has been killing on a regular basis before. She's the one presenting the alternatives, Bob isn't. She's the one performing the murders, Bob isn't. She's the one that deserves my anger.

In a similar fashion I am not angry with anyone saying "two" either, "beacuse they could've said none yadayada". I am, almost exclusively, angry with Alice.