this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1056 points (99.2% liked)

World News

45405 readers
4450 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Global leaders criticized Trump’s new tariffs, which range from 10% to 49%, warning of trade wars and economic fallout.

The UK and Italy urged negotiation, while Brazil passed a reciprocity bill. China and South Korea vowed countermeasures.

Australia and New Zealand rejected Trump’s logic, citing existing trade deals and low tariffs. Norfolk Island was baffled by a 29% duty despite having no exports.

Financial markets dropped, oil and bitcoin sank, and leaders warned of inflation. Analysts say Trump risks fracturing global trade with little to gain economically.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago (21 children)

You don't even have to go that far. Just adopt sane copyright laws, like copyright only lasting the life of the artist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (16 children)

Copyright and patent laws should just go away entirely.

The amount of resources we spend enforcing them, just so we can spend more resources on the products themselves, could all be spent improving the lives of people who need it.

Most great art doesn't make much money anyways, barely more than a service job if you're lucky. It's the trashy-shit for low-standards morons that makes an egregious amount of money, like the marvel crap we keep seeing every year.

I'd be fine with less marvel-crap in the world. It'll make what we do get more impactful, and we can dedicate more resources to fewer, higher-quality products.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Your mistake is thinking that Marvel is art.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everything done with skill is art. From Citizen Kane to the design of a candy wrapper.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but that wording becomes detrimental when you only expect high-quality things because that's what you associate with art, forgetting that there is also entertainment that doesn't need to be high quality necessarily.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

MY wording?

You were the one claiming marvel movies weren't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm referring to the original poster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You're like 6 levels deep into a thread, being vague like this is completely inscrutable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Oh yeah, I didn't notice the thread is deeper. I meant lumony, the person I originally responded to. They called Marvel art (which is fine) and called it useless slop or something like that.. So clearly we are talking about art as something that needs to have quality. I responded to them that their mistake is thinking that its art (in the sense that it needs to have quality). It's just entertainment, not all movies need to be citizen Kane or whatever. Is it more clear now or..?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)