jordanlund

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 minutes ago

That boy aint right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 minutes ago

I mean, pretty hard to tell since I don't work for a reporting agency, but that many credit pulls and cancellations close together, along with the rapid increase and decrease in available credit, plus multiple closed accounts isn't going to do you any favors.

Do any of your current cards have a credit score option on them? Will be interesting to see how that changes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 minutes ago

Seems prudent, Trump is only 4 years younger and I hope Vance's people are working on the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

Official links on this:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/03/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-adjusts-imports-of-automobiles-and-automobile-parts-into-the-united-states/

"The 25% tariff will be applied to imported passenger vehicles (sedans, SUVs, crossovers, minivans, cargo vans) and light trucks, as well as key automobile parts (engines, transmissions, powertrain parts, and electrical components), with processes to expand tariffs on additional parts if necessary."

"The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical vulnerabilities and choke points in global supply chains, undermining our ability to maintain a resilient domestic industrial base."

That's partially true, it wasn't the pandemic, it was losing all the Ukranian vehicle wiring harnesses at the same time as the pandemic.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/ukraine-invasion-hurts-flow-wire-harnesses-carmakers-2022-03-02/

"TARIFFS WORK: Studies have repeatedly shown that tariffs can be an effective tool for reducing or eliminating threats to impair U.S. national security and achieving economic and strategic objectives.

A 2024 study on the effects of President Trump’s tariffs in his first term found that they “strengthened the U.S. economy” and “led to significant reshoring” in industries like manufacturing and steel production."

Hmmm... if only there was a source for that...

https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-china-mexico-canada-fentanyl-inflation-cf905e75e863511baef959a80ee2eea2

"Trump imposed tariffs on solar panels and washing machines at the start of 2018, moves that might have pushed up prices in those sectors even though they also overlapped with plans to open washing machine plants in Tennessee and South Carolina.

His administration also levied tariffs on steel and aluminum, including against allies. He then increased tariffs on China, leading to a trade conflict and a limited 2020 agreement that failed to produce the promised Chinese purchases of U.S. goods.

The Federal Reserve kept inflation roughly on target, but factory construction spending never jumped in a way that suggested a lasting gain in manufacturing jobs. Separate economic research found the tariff war with China did nothing economically for the communities hurt by offshoring, but it did help Trump and Republicans in those communities politically.

When Trump first became president in 2017, the federal government collected $34.6 billion in customs, duties and fees. That sum more than doubled under Trump to $70.8 billion in 2019, according to Office of Management and Budget records.

While that sum might seem meaningful, it was relatively small compared with the overall economy. America’s gross domestic product is now $29.3 trillion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The total tariffs collected in the United States would equal less than 0.3% of GDP."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 44 minutes ago

One of the big things I learned during the pandemic... Vehicle wiring harnesses largely come from Ukraine.

So when Russia invaded, new car supply tanked. People were unable to return lease vehicles because there wasn't enough new stock to trade in for. Completed vehicles sat unsold because the wiring couldn't be completed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 50 minutes ago

This is true, or, you know, be forced to use secure government equipment and not burner phones. :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 52 minutes ago

My wife is calling this "WhiskeyLeaks". LOL.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago) (1 children)

Dropsite isn't banned because of credibility, it's banned because we don't allow blogs. Full stop.

You could be the most award winning journalist in the world on Twitter or Facebook, you're still getting removed because we don't allow Twitter or Facebook.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 57 minutes ago

Everyone who wants a job, house, bank account, doctor, etc. etc. needs at least an ID card.

It's not possible to function in modern society without identification.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It isn't voter suppression. Again, look at a blue state that tied voter registration to state ID:

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/12/26/oregon-voter-turnout-dropped-75-percent-2024-election/

"Since 2012, the last election before the new system, the percentage of eligible Oregonians registered to vote has increased from 75% to 94%."

Registrations are up.

Look at the election turnout in Oregon compared to national turnout since enabling motor voting in 2016:

2016 - 80.33% vs. 59.2%
2018 - 67.8% vs. 53.4%
2020 - 78.5% vs. 65.3%
2022 - 66.9% vs. 46.8%
2024 - 75% vs. 63.4%

Turnout is up. Nobody is being disenfrachised here, more people are registered, more people are participating. All of that TERRIFIES Republicans.

Sources:

https://sos.oregon.gov/elections/Documents/Voter_Turnout_History_General_Election.pdf

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/voter-turnout-in-presidential-elections

https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/04/behind-2018-united-states-midterm-election-turnout.html

https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2022:_Analysis_of_voter_turnout

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

The point being motor voting and vote by mail works, even if it is tied to a state ID and it's not a Republican thing.

Look at the election turnout in Oregon compared to national turnout since enabling motor voting in 2016:

2016 - 80.33% vs. 59.2%
2018 - 67.8% vs. 53.4%
2020 - 78.5% vs. 65.3%
2022 - 66.9% vs. 46.8%
2024 - 75% vs. 63.4%

Sources:

https://sos.oregon.gov/elections/Documents/Voter_Turnout_History_General_Election.pdf

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/12/26/oregon-voter-turnout-dropped-75-percent-2024-election/

"Since 2012, the last election before the new system, the percentage of eligible Oregonians registered to vote has increased from 75% to 94%."

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/voter-turnout-in-presidential-elections

https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/04/behind-2018-united-states-midterm-election-turnout.html

https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2022:_Analysis_of_voter_turnout

 

If anyone needs a list for protest action, it's super cool for the White House to put it all in one place.

 

"Sec. 3.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person."

So, wait, doesn't all that mean this order does nothing? 🤔

 

So who's going to tell him that you don't call poison control for a fentanyl overdose? That's what 911 is for...

 

How is that going to work when you keep attacking ag. workers? 🤔

26
Pastéis de nata (www.biggreenegg.eu)
 

I haven't made these... YET... but they look AMAZING.

view more: next ›