this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
1096 points (97.8% liked)

Harry Potter

948 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You don't have to ditch it, just make it so it's not a guaranteed win under normal circumstances. Make it so the snitch isn't released until a certain amount of time has passed, or points have been scored. And instead of having it be worth a ton of points, have it be worth a small enough amount that it could make a difference in a close game but not the only deciding factor. Then it's a strategic position. A position that requires timing instead of just speed.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 25 points 2 weeks ago

Just make it so that catching the snitch ends the game. As in, the scores from either side get fixed. This way the losing team would have an incentive to stop the winning team from getting it, but themselves wouldn't be interested in doing so. It's not game breaking, just another angle.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

The mechanic of catching the snitch immediately ending the game is a pretty good one, and there's several ways you could go about it.

  • Adds no points to either side: you want to catch it when your team is up, but if you find it when your team is down, you want to misdirect the other team's Seeker

  • Adds a small number of points to your side: you want to catch it when your team is within striking distance of a win

  • Adds a small number of points to the opposite side: you only want to catch it when your team is up significanty

My favorite would be a random or rotating points penalty. Like say every 3 minutes the points given to each side upon grabbing the snitch is randomized. It still allows for that stupid main character syndrome special boy causing the win thing, but it doesn't completely break the strategy of the game.