this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
312 points (83.9% liked)

Technology

68772 readers
5050 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Dear ...,

Have you ever wondered of having a Wikipedia page for yourself or your company? We can help you get a Wikipedia page for yourself or your brand. 

Why have a Wikipedia page?

 

Google loves Wikipedia and as such ranks it high in search results. Wikipedia is
also the first place people go when they Google your name. By leveraging
Wikipedia, you can help control your Online Profile and present yourself to the
world. Usually Wikipedia only accepts pages on celebrities and famous companies,
if you are looking to get one for yourself, we can help you with that. Having a page
for yourself in Wikipedia, brings you more credibility and makes you more
famous. 

We have been editing on Wikipedia for 9+ years and We've created tons of pages
for companies, people, brands, products, and of course for academic purposes as
well.

We own multiple accounts on Wikipedia with page curation and new page
reviewer rights, so we can create and moderate pages with almost zero risk of
another mod taking it down. 

There are few Wikipedia editors who are willing to create a page for money, and
most of them are scared to offer this service directly, so they do it through their
trusted sellers who mark up the price to $1500 - $2500 per page. 

Because you're buying directly from an experienced Wikipedia editor and mod,
you'll get your page a lot cheaper, faster and with more reliability. 

Let me know if you are interested.

Regards

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm guessing how that goes is you pay them, they do actually make you a page, it gets quickly deleted for not meeting Wikipedia's standards, and then they go "sorry no refunds". Step 0 to getting a Wikipedia page about yourself is to be notable enough for one, which >99.9% of people are not.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And even if technically notable enough, you still need some objective sources for any claims made, even simple things like profession, even if your works speak for themselves. And what the mods deem an acceptable source seems arbitrary.

I listen to a lot of indie music or local smaller bands, and often, even though they gig a lot and have several albums practically on every digital platform, I can’t find the bands in there, nor any of their members.

Often there’s a red page there with some contributor discussions where they argue with each other about these things.

Seems so wonky to me, since I just came from their gig, having listened to them for 10+ years.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

You can ask me about sources. We probably all know what "reliable" means, and claims may cite any reliable source (even sources written by the subject of the article if the fact is uncontroversial). However, for an article to be included in Wikipedia, and mainly so that it's possible for the article to be improved so that it conforms with Wikipedia's guidelines, articles must pass "notability" (a misnomer, see efforts to change its name); the biggest component of notability that's most often failed is that there is enough coverage in reliable sources not written by the subject, and that's precisely so that we won't have an article that's entirely the subject's own puffery that turns out to be false or egregiously biased. (Not an admin because I probably have too short a temper, but nonetheless experienced.)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm surprised and not surprised I guess that there's a business offering to write Wikipedia articles like this. I suppose it's naivety to think that Wikipedia articles are written with good intentions.

[–] floofloof 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I suppose it’s naivety to think that Wikipedia articles are written with good intentions.

I think the amazing thing is that most still are.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

The vast majority, in fact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, all those biased articles on procyonidi.. what are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

For some reason they didn't reach out to me after I received my doctorate in Geopsychology at Abide University...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

If the information on the page is accurate, what exactly is the issue here?