this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
71 points (98.6% liked)
PC Gaming
10800 readers
559 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Milking an IP dry for 40+ years like Nintendo sounds like an evil Easter egg to find in the game, not what to do with it.
Otherwise, me and the wife love playing it co-op.
Nintendo doesn't really "dry" their IPs. They actually innovate between games, making sure each installment is worthy of existing. They don't just slap a new number on the same content as last time, like the EAs, Ubisofts and Actiblizzards of the industry.
That's why they've lasted. A game featuring Mario or Link isn't so much a familiar IP, as it has become a seal of quality.
Doesn't mean they aren't guilty of a bunch of other anti-consumer bullshit.
Absolutely agree.
Pokemon, on the other hand ...
Gamefreak needs a fire lit under their ass.
One they can't put out by litigating it to shreds.