this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
272 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38571 readers
127 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OminousOrange 63 points 1 month ago (13 children)

It's quite interesting how American's have always been about their government's "checks and balances" to prevent tyranny, but all it took was one person who was fine with saying, "fuck your checks and balances" to effectively create a dictatorship, and the whole government is left blabbering, "you can't do that" with no mechanism to actually do anything meaningful to remove the tyrant.

Like, I'm sure there were "checks and balances" in place for employing directors of these various governments offices, so it's almost comical that a President can just fire anyone who doesn't agree with him. I suppose it's not surprising for a country with very little worker protections, though.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

While there are certainly flaws in the American system of government, this is not the result of one man simply being above the law. There are plenty of existing ways to stop this from happening but half of the government is actively supporting his efforts. There is no system of government that can survive when the people who are charged with enforcing the rules collectively decide not to enforce them. At that point the specifics don't matter.

[–] OminousOrange 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a great point. Doesn't much matter if there are methods in place if many are complicit in the tyranny.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

It's all social contracts. When those break down, a lot of shit breaks.

Also when one party refuses to do jack shit about the approaching storm, hoping for the status quo and retaining their little bits of power. That doesn't help either.

load more comments (10 replies)