Linux

8376 readers

508 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

159

Flatpak is not perfect, but it's getting better (thelibre.news)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Article doesn't mention my biggest problem with flatpaks, that the packages are not digitally signed. All major Linux distros sign their packages, and flathub should too. I would prefer to see digital signatures from both flathub and the package's maintainer. I don't believe flathub has either one currently.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

It is possible to sign a flatpak, but yeah distributors need to actually do that and flathub should require published flatpaks to be signed.

load more comments (8 replies)