Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
view the rest of the comments
Got it. None of the witnesses are claiming that. In fact they asked them why they call them “non human intelligence “ instead of extraterrestrial and they said it’s because they don’t know the origin.
Your other assumptions are also in contradiction with the statements and documents that have been released regarding an alleged recovery in italy in 1930.
Its easy to anchor our expectations on the typical and easily disregarded lowest common denominator. Especially in topics that are exploited by grifters. but they are not claiming any of that.
I think it’s reasonable to ignore the claims until there is evidence. But it’s not really reasonable to conflate them with a strawman version of their testimony and dismiss them as crazy.
Unserios?, Who are you talking about? the witnesses? again. it's easy to think about the grifters but the witnesses are as credible as they can get. if you really are talking about the witnesses you'd probably be better off ignoring the topic or actually getting some facts instead of conflating them with grifters or making so many baseless assumptions.
since you didn't respond to what I said about italy, I ask you what is your basis for claiming that it's only happening in the US? there is plenty of evidence that shows that's false.
what is your basis for claiming that they are not serious? do you think unserious people can retain their security clearance after making "idiotic and userious" claims?
I'm asking what is your basis because It's apparently coming from your bias on the topic, not on the facts that have been presented nor the allegations that have been made.