this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
70 points (94.9% liked)
PC Gaming
11615 readers
501 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hmm. I gotta say, I got alarm bells going off in my head as soon as I saw the charts at 2:57 and 3:02. All four tests came out exactly the same in both trials? Not a single frame of difference for 1% lows or the average? I wouldn't expect results that consistent if they were run back to back, let alone months apart on new drivers...
Oh lord, 3:27 is even more suspect. The 5070 gets the exact same result twice, but then the 9070's updates make it also exactly the same??? aint no way chief
Is that based on the assumption that the numbers come from single runs instead of averages of multiple runs?
I don't see the number of runs stated anywhere. Still would be pretty unlikely to get the exact same results, and even more still for a 9070 to perform exactly the same as a 5070
So HU are fudging the numbers to favor ....?
I'm not making any claims except that these first several results look extremely suspect