this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
1086 points (99.7% liked)

Progressive Politics

2927 readers
297 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Words matter.

You aren't writing an academic paper. Always use simple direct language.

  • Help the poor
  • Healthcare for everyone
  • Good treatment at work.

Don't use complex words.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 days ago (30 children)

Propaganda works

I’ve always said that if you really wanted communism or socialism to take off in the states you’re gonna have to call it something else

I also don’t use cis because the machine has already made that a thing people don’t want to be called

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 days ago (18 children)

"Cis" is fucking silly, that's why I don't like it. We already had "hetero". It's like "they/them" for an individual. Try reading a novel where one charter is "they/them". It's needlessly confusing, and bring the hate, it's a stupid fad. Seen this kinda thing come and go, 20-years, no one will be using it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Cis is just the opposite of trans, but it has nothing to do with orientation. You can be cis and heterosexual, you can be cis and homosexual.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Honestly did not know that. Don't know how I would have, given the context in which cis is commonly applied. Context being: heterosexual male. Additional context: Often as an insult. See also: Breeder. (Was that usage archaic? More on that in a moment.)

So we really need a word to define 99.5% of Earth's population? When we have a word to define the remaining .05%? Do you have any idea how silly that sounds?!

20-years, no one will be using it

Been there, seen that, done that. And fuck anyone who doesn't like it. I've equated trans rights with civil rights since before most of you kids touched social media.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Yes, we do need a word, because it's useful to be able to describe things. That's what language is for.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Further context you may not know: "cis" is indeed much older than even the internet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Dude not even heard of Transjordan and Cisjordan?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Don't know how I would have

School? It's a scientific term, trans people did not invent it.

Context being: heterosexual male.

That is not the context it is used in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)