this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
252 points (97.4% liked)

Linux Gaming

19971 readers
362 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a super interesting project, and the video is really well presented and explained, if you prefer that format.

I think this method could be brought even further by using 'thin clients' (a cheap laptop or used office mini-PC), making it possible to access the main gaming rig from any room in the house as long as you have access to a good network speed.

Utilizing a 'dummy' HDMI or Displayport stick, which simulates a monitor for the GPU, you could then remote into the gaming rig from a thin client-like PC through Moonlight/Sunlight, allowing you to use it as a fully fledged gaming or workstation PC.

If anyone decides to go that route, be aware that AMD GPU's have pretty notoriously bad encoders, so I'd recommend sticking with Nvidia (Pascal/1000 series or newer) or Intel GPU's/Integrated Graphics (6th generation 6000 series or newer) for the Host machine. It's a little less important for the client, I think.

EDIT: AMD did actually improve their encoders in recent years, starting with the Raven Ridge integrated graphics APUs, and the first generation Navi cards (RX 5700 onward, the lower end cards don't have it).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 days ago (8 children)

AMD GPU's have pretty notoriously bad encoders/decoders, so I'd recommend sticking with Nvidia or Intel GPU's.

Where do people get this idea??

Here is 1440p 60fps from my 6700 XT

https://youtu.be/F4mFHM6aAiA

Ive been using emby for a few years and firefox doesn't support HVEC where all my content is HVEC and have had 0 issues with my gpu re-encoding the video

Its just nvidia fanboy bs

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Well I'll be damned! AMD does seem to have up their encoder game with the Navi series onward.

They were rightfully called out as having pretty bad encoders before that though, which I personally experienced on an RX 480 I used to have in my system. It made parsec a bit blurry and added quite a bit of latency.

Also, I would stand by the recommendation to avoid older office PC's with AMD graphics, since none of them are going to have Navi graphics.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

avoid older office PC’s with AMD graphics though, since none of them are going to have Navi graphics.

The key word here being older. These days, AMD CPUs have a couple of Navi graphics cores built in, and they're good for both office tasks and video encoding.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

True, for anyone who has a more modern AMD laptop, it would fare well with Parsec.

load more comments (5 replies)