/kbin meta

63 readers

1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 2 years ago

What to do about ghost magazines that have no content? (kbin.social)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It seems like when the big reddit migration happened, a lot of new users claimed magazine names on kbin instances that were popular on reddit in order to have ownership of them, but they seemingly have no interest in posting content to them. This has unfortunately caused lot of otherwise useful magazines to remain dormant, vacant, and unused.

Would it make sense to have these ghost magazines expire or have a system for changing ownership of them if no one uses them? It's a shame if the good names are taken and immediately abandoned, and it's not a great user experience to look for communities only to find so many empty and abandoned magazines.

I'm curious what opinions are regarding this matter. Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Every magazine has a first post. You don't know what engagement you have until you being engaging. If it you get engagement from the community, good! If you don't get engagement, at least you tried. It's not screaming into the void until you have a wall of your own content staring back at you from the magazine.