this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
262 points (99.6% liked)

196

16925 readers
1552 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago (7 children)

They're not going to give up their control willingly, hence the killing them part.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

But you still haven’t refuted my main point. If killing them just creates new billionaires, what does that actually achieve?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I mean the general idea is we kill them and take their property instead of giving it to their heirs. Killing the billionaires is generally something that occurs as part of the larger revolution and not just a leisurely Sunday activity

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sure, and that worked when money was a tangible asset rather than a speculative one. It really doesn’t apply in modern times when most money can’t be physically taken.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Bro what part of a revolution do you not understand. The people saying this stuff are communists and leftists. After a revolution there won't be stocks left to own or corporations. The whole point of communist revolution is to seize the companies and desolve the capitalist institutions. Surely you understand this no?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Do you think billionaires actually have billions sitting in banks holy shit. They own assets bruh. That's what we'd be taking.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)