this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
687 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

61263 readers
4146 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
687
"They need us. We don't need them:" The fall of Twitter is making the trolls and grifters desperate (www.salon.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
125 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

but that something trained on public material is privately owned.

Is that really a problem? Is a create something new based on public knowledge, should I not be able to profit from it?

I learn to paint from YouTube, should I paint for free now?

I'll admit that the scope of ChatGPT is MUCH bigger than one person painting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I’d say that was a more controversial opinion. From a purist perspective I tend to believe that intellectual property in general is not ethical and stifles innovation.