this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
108 points (100.0% liked)

196

16905 readers
1217 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

hmm, I imagine the then 2 prevalent systems of neoliberal capitalism and soviet-style "communism" to be a pretty terrible combination actually. Although I believe I get what he was trying to say about individual rights within an economy of the commons(or at least thats how I interpret it).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I can't follow, would you elaborate? Sounds like an interesting debate :)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The funny combination would be to combine the single party authoritarian structure with a completly unregulated economy for maximum carnage :P

As far as I underatand the quote, hes talking about needing a socialist system where the rights of individuals are respected and protected, but factories, housing etc is owned and and managed by the commons.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

That kinda sounds like the goal of socialism to me, with a state managing the societal functions but the workers owning the means of production but still in a capitalist environment

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

funny, "we all lift together" started playing in my head.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I love stumbling about references to this game

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Your first paragraph pretty much describes the PRC.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)