this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2021
13 points (88.2% liked)

Lemmy

12864 readers
4 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to [email protected].

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am thinking about creating an outpost in Lemmy for Reddit's r/moderatepolitics subreddit. Briefly, the goal of the subreddit is to bring together a variety of viewpoints with rules that are mostly limited to not attacking other users and some operational rules (e.g. no editorialized headlines). These loose rules have allowed us to bring together voices from across the political spectrum for discussions that usually get stuck in echo chambers.

When I was looking through the Code of Conduct for the lemmy.ml instance, I noticed that it bans "oppressive" speech. That raised an immediate red flag for me. That term is so vague and broad as to leave an immense amount of discretionary power to an admin making a moderation decision. I know several of the admins on this instance are very left wing. Nothing wrong with that, but many on the left hold a rather expansive view of what oppressive speech is that includes even moderate or center-right discourse, never mind further right.

Is there any room to build this type of community on lemmy.ml? Or will we be forced to choose between our own instance or living with the threat of intervention that labels some elements of community discourse as oppressive?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (8 children)

it bans “oppressive” speech

As in slurs, hate speech, bigotry, personal attacks, stuff like that. Any discussion worth listening to should be able to make their points without any of these.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (4 children)

I agree "oppressive speech" doesn't make sense, at least not to a lot of people. You could change it to

"insulting speech"

"speech directed against an individual"

"slurs, hate speech, bigotry, personal attacks"

Normally the tools of oppression are guns, fences, censorship. Speech is the major weapon against oppression. The term "oppressive speech" sounds like a euphamism. A lot of good people will be justifiably suspicious.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

what dessalines said about the power dynamic is important, people should be able to insult and target those keeping them down

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

It sounds like the word "insult" means something different for us both.

For me, insulting is what we're talking about here, useless counterproductive attacks against one of the other people in the debate. Something that might make him feel miserable, alone, even oppressed. It seems to perfectly describe what we are trying to proscribe here.

In the pub, sure, insulting people is part of the social dynamic, but not on a safe-space type internet forum like lemmy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)