this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
829 points (85.8% liked)

Memes

46742 readers
1372 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The amount of male sexual abuse that goes unheard of is nearly 95-100% of the times, because both women and men tease it as the abused man "wanting it" and/or "enjoying the touch", leading to feminists claiming "all men" to be these evil women predators as an entire gender.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That doesn't address my response at all - are you in agreement with it?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I am not. You are enforcing a misandrist narrative. Not all men want to be sexually groped and touched. Most men are good people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Which of my statements do you disagree with?

Do you think men aren't likely to be physically forced into giving head by a woman?

Do you think men aren't likely to be forced into giving head to a woman by power dynamics?

I noticed that you're conflating what is portrayed in this meme with being groped or touched.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The basis of your statement when you say "less chance of the guy being coerced to do this by power dynamics" has a historical context of "both women and men tease it as the abused man “wanting it” and/or “enjoying the touch”". Both men and women have encouraged this behaviour against men in the exact same way women get eve teased or their butts spanked. But women are the perpetrators of this male SA/rape stuff, since they demand it or covertly blackmail men.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a big wall of text that doesn't answer my questions - can you answer them directly? You can provide as much context as you feel necessary to explain your yes or no answer, but please provide a yes or no answer so I fully understand where you stand.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

3 sentences is not a wall of text. And life is not as simple as a yes or no. You should have refrained from talking if you cannot even talk or read that much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh I read it, but it simply didn't answer my question. You provided context, sure, but ultimately did not state a conclusive answer, and across two, maybe three comments now? you are still unable to answer my simple questions. We're not exactly discussing the meaning of life here.

Do you think it is likely for women to physically force a man to give her head?

I feel like that's a simple enough question, since it's isolated to physical means. Which gender typically has more strength? Which gender typically has more means to threaten with violence?

Further dodging the question will only suggest the extent of the mental gymnastics you're going through to avoid cognitive dissonance.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. I'm not going to bother anymore if you refuse to answer a simple question.