this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2021
36 points (95.0% liked)

Lemmy

13592 readers
11 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to [email protected].

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy should rely less on JavaScript.
Currently without JS you can't even expand the main menu.

Additionally, all those controls should also work without JS.
Or worse option - since they only work with JS, don't show them when JS is disabled.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago) (8 children)

The user experience on javascript-enabled browsers is also really great. Going for a nojs-first approach would hurt UX a lot, especially on mobile.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (3 children)

"Going for a nojs-first approach would hurt UX a lot, especially on mobile."

WTF?!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (2 children)

It would. If used properly, JS can have really improve UI/UX. Sure, you can make good JS-free pages, but JS can make it easier and arguably better (by being more dynamic, which appeals to a wider audience than static pages).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 years ago
  1. No, it would not.

  2. Progressive Enhancement

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)