this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2021
5 points (58.1% liked)

World News

32895 readers
767 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Certainly, no one is in favour of foreign intervention (i.e. US). I wonder though how much is driven by legitimate grievances due to economic mismanagement? As per this thread.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Not having food or vaccines sounds like a legitimate grievance to me

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 years ago (2 children)

US blockade is the reason for those problems.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago

No doubt, the US blockade is criminal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Does that make their grievances any less valid?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

If the grievance is that US is harming people in Cuba by preventing Cuba from being able to trade with other countries, then no.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

There could be legitimate grievances among the people for sure. Food, medical, and power shortages are all real (and the fault of the US blockade), but these protests have gone far beyond that in the imperial core. Almost 350k people have signed a petition demanding US military intervention for "humanitarian" reasons. To voice support for these protests is to enable and encourage those who seek Cuban blood.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

I can agree with that. In such circumstances, how do you minimize foreign intervention influence while simultaneously avoiding repressing discussion of domestic grievances?