this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

TechNews

4217 readers
1 users here now

Aggregated tech news.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[ comments | sourced from HackerNews ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Remember that in some states in the United States, you need to invoke the 5th amendment before you have the right to remain silent. Otherwise, your silence can be used against you.

Say a simple phrase like: "I invoke my 5th amendment rights to silence, and I would like to contact to an attorney."

From: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/when-how-invoke-your-right-silence.html

You Can't Be Silent If You Want to Be Silent

In a closely contested 2013 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that prosecutors can, under appropriate circumstances, point to an out-of-custody suspect's silence in response to police questioning as evidence of guilt. (Salinas v. Texas, 133 S. Ct. 2174 (2013).)

Using Evidence of Silence to Prove Guilt

According to the Court, the prosecution can comment on the silence of a suspect who:

is out of police custody (and not Mirandized) voluntarily submits to police questioning, and stays silent without expressly invoking his Fifth Amendment rights.

The only way to prevent the government from introducing evidence of the suspect's silence at trial is to explicitly invoke (assert) the right to say nothing. In other words, without being warned by the police or advised by a lawyer, and without even the benefit of the familiar Miranda warnings (which might trigger an "I want to invoke my right to be silent!"), the interviewee must apparently say words to the effect of, "I invoke my privilege against self-incrimination."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

It's shit like this that makes me think we just need to reset our legal code.