this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
80 points (69.2% liked)

World News

33089 readers
600 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure but what's the forest growth per capita?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is that relevant? Serious question, I don’t see a link between forests and per capita that actually matters. If we were talking about economic comparisons, sure. If anything, adjusting it as “per sq mile of forestable land” would make more sense.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's relevant because, as demonstrated multiple times in this thread, when the topic of pollution and emissions from China comes up everyone rushes to defend them with "but muh per capita". As if the environment cares.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you said something irrelevant as a jumping off point for an axe you wanted to grind? Good job

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Link your Twitter. I bet you have a statue pfp