this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2020
2 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

32313 readers
131 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

Good TL;DR.

I'm slightly confused why the community is seeing this as controversial though. Isn't the whole idea that OSM would take over as a dominant atlas database exactly what the project's end goal is? It just has the side effect that tech companies start to use and contribute to their database.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

I agree, but I will always be more than a bit apprehensive whenever Amazon, Microsoft, Apple and freaking Facebook are involved. If they make OSM more feature rich so they can compete with Google Maps more successfully: good. However, I am worried that they might pull off some sleazy moves, like for example removing Google's buildings from OSM out of spite. I hope I'm just being paranoid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago)

will always be more than a bit apprehensive whenever Amazon, Microsoft, Apple and freaking Facebook are involved

A bit unnerving to see the "Advisory Board" (https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Advisory_Board) being populated with some of them