this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
65 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

38101 readers
521 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just received my invite code today and took a quick look around the app. Like Mastodon I do not prefer microblogging platforms. And that's all I know about Bluesky.

So, what can you tell me about this project?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (20 children)

They're not cryptocurrency fanatics. None of the project relies on cryptocurrency tech. Even Jack himself deleted his account and ran off to nostr.

Bluesky uses a model with user identities based on cryptographic keypairs, posts held in a personal account repository (git-like), and posts use content addressing (hash ID of posts), and everything is portable so you can move your account between host servers without breaking any references.

Federation is up in the sandbox environment with 3rd party implementations participating.

It's more robust against enshittification than your average Mastodon server

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

It's more robust against enshittification than your average Mastodon server

I’m very skeptical of that. What makes Mastodon so robust against enshittification is that it’s hard for a single or small set of players to have so much control that they can act as gatekeeper to extract money from the user base.

Blue Sky is a for-profit corporation. How do they plan to make money? Who controls access to the network? These are genuine questions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Blue Sky is a for-profit corporation. How do they plan to make money?

🤷

They use domain names for handles, they do have a partnership with one registrar for integration for users who want custom domains for handles (commission model). Other than that, to be seen.

Who controls access to the network?

Once full federation is live, nobody. Anybody could create a relay server (BGS, shared cache server like a CDN), and anybody can run a PDS (account hosting server).

3rd parties already run feeds on their own servers and 3rd party clients exists, and the sandbox network for federation testing has 3rd party PDS servers too.

For user account lookups, if you use the web-DID type then you're not dependent on bluesky servers at all.

Account portability and the ability to mix and match services and switch quickly are the biggest enshittification protection mechanisms. You can't really lock in users in this model. You can't even prevent users from ditching your PDS account host if they kept a backup of their data and held their own keys.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for the response. Alas, the monetization question is key to enshittification. I'm left unassuaged.

Let's take a concrete example. There are a bunch of neo-nazis inciting real violence on Blue Sky. People will die. Does anyone have the power to do anything about them? Or can the neo-nazis " mix and match services and switch quickly" to escape any consequences? It's a dilemma either way. On one fork, BS has no control, which means bad actors run free. On the other fork, BS does have control, which suggests they're not as enshittification resistant as it may seem.

I know and am happy with how Activity Pub (Lemmy/Mastodon) deals with both forks, as imperfect as the system is. What about Blue Sky?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, with no strong central control the best you can do is to persuade PDS account servers and client developers to put in good moderation filters by default, so that the average user won't have to see that stuff assuming they land on a client/server which filter it. You can't stop it from existing in the network, but you can coordinate ways to inhibit reach. And users who need even better tools can deploy them without having to move.

On the other hand, the work on private profiles haven't started yet, and you can't currently prevent yourself from getting visible to others.

On Mastodon the options are essentially just finding a server with a good moderation team and importing block list files manually, as well as keyword filters. And that's pretty much it. The server features and moderation quality are part of the same bundle.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)