this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
63 points (98.5% liked)

Ukraine

8897 readers
1897 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space

Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³πŸ’₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

πŸ’³βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

πŸͺ– 🫑 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey look! A valid military target!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's over 1,000 km from Ukraine; I don't think they have anything with that range. That is beyond even the elusive Taurus in its original form.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm hearing the US should supply Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine to enable deep strikes on Russian manufacturing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh no, another red line! How many were there now?

Normally, the Russian air defense should deal with Tomahawks easily (they've had decades to prepare: Tomahawks are nuclear-capable, so it was a top priority to develop the look-down shoot-down capabilities of the MiG-31 and others), but the way it's been going recently I would give it a substantial chance of getting through to Alabuga.