Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
view the rest of the comments
besides corruption, is there any economical model in use as an argument to keep these monopolies from being broken up into pieces?
Capitalism itself is pretty dependent on them actually. See "too big to fail." It all stems from the failings of capitalism in the end.
i don't think it even qualifies as capitalism at that point.
It totally is. Pure capitalism is about profit at all moral and societal costs.
Yes of course, but "too big to fail" is not an argument to not break up monopolies (if that was the case, it needs to be nationalized). Because, in the scenario of "too big to fail", the issue is rather the opposite; a company posing a risk to the nation if they fail to secure profit at all moral and societal cost. I mean, if a company is irreplaceable with no room to be replaced by another, it no longer plays the game of capitalism as it will be kept in operation through taxes due to a failure to be profitable.