this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)
privacy
372 readers
1 users here now
Rules (WIP)
- No ad hominem allowed
- Attack the idea, not the poster
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Seems like a 4th amendment issue. Can you compel me to unlock a filing cabinet? To hand over a journal? To allow you to read my mail? With a warrant that covers those items? Sure. But without a warrant that's gonna be a no. Any ruling which would treat a phone differently is blatantly ignoring the constitution.
You may be absolutely right about a warrantless search discussed in the “See also”. EFF’s opinion (the main link) is about something different, though somewhat related. The situation seems to be…
Police procured a search warrant for defendant's cell phone but were unable to execute the warrant because the cell phone was passcode protected and defendant refused to provide the passcode. Accordingly, the State filed a motion to compel production of the cell phone's passcode.
EFF argues that even in this situation with a warrant, Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination mean that the defendant can’t be forced to reveal the passcode: